Emily Duru, a PhD student in English at Howard University, used Tableau Public to create a pair of visualizations that make HBCU funding disparities impossible to ignore. Her dashboard compares the top HBCUs to a sample of elite public and private PWIs, and the results are staggering. The combined endowments of the top 10 PWIs are more than 100 times larger than those of the top HBCUs.
Her work shows how HBCUs like Prairie View A&M and Howard University operate under intense financial pressure while producing some of the best outcomes for Black graduates. Prairie View A&M’s endowment is 133 percent smaller than Texas A&M’s, even though both are part of the same university system. At the same time, Howard’s endowment accounts for 29 percent of all private HBCU endowments and is still minuscule when compared to Harvard or Yale.
Emily’s visualization also breaks down operating revenue. She shows that while PWIs benefit from large government allocations, HBCUs rely heavily on tuition and private gifts. Public HBCUs in particular are vulnerable. Despite educating over 70 percent of all HBCU students, they receive far less state support than their PWI counterparts.
This visualization tells a story that is both urgent and structural. Emily’s work reflects the broader mission of the Black Data Lab at Howard: to turn raw data into clear stories that reach beyond academic walls. In a moment when federal funding and affirmative action are under attack, this kind of work pushes us to ask not just what the numbers say, but why the inequality persists. Her dashboard proves that data storytelling is a powerful method for truth-telling.
Her work shows how HBCUs like Prairie View A&M and Howard University operate under intense financial pressure while producing some of the best outcomes for Black graduates. Prairie View A&M’s endowment is 133 percent smaller than Texas A&M’s, even though both are part of the same university system. At the same time, Howard’s endowment accounts for 29 percent of all private HBCU endowments and is still minuscule when compared to Harvard or Yale.
Emily’s visualization also breaks down operating revenue. She shows that while PWIs benefit from large government allocations, HBCUs rely heavily on tuition and private gifts. Public HBCUs in particular are vulnerable. Despite educating over 70 percent of all HBCU students, they receive far less state support than their PWI counterparts.
This visualization tells a story that is both urgent and structural. Emily’s work reflects the broader mission of the Black Data Lab at Howard: to turn raw data into clear stories that reach beyond academic walls. In a moment when federal funding and affirmative action are under attack, this kind of work pushes us to ask not just what the numbers say, but why the inequality persists. Her dashboard proves that data storytelling is a powerful method for truth-telling.
Related: