Wednesday, April 1, 2026

Another Chapter in the Howard vs. Howard Photoshoot Saga




For more than a decade, I successfully evaded university photographer Howard Ash, who had been working diligently, and continually failing, to get me to meet for a photoshoot. But he won on Monday after unfairly securing assistance from Associate Dean Elizabeth Cali and marketing associates Kalli Collins and Madelaine Deardeuff.

First, Cali, Collins, and Deardeuff worked with me on an article about the Black Lit Network that will appear in university publications. Then they informed me that I would need to update my headshot. As always, I was initially reluctant, but when I realized that it had somehow been more than ten years since my first photoshoot, I agreed.
Howard Ash, university photographer, preparing to take images

The first photoshoot I did with Ash took place in the Redmond Reading Room on the third floor of the library on March 18, 2015. When we scheduled this most recent one for March 30, 2026, I arranged for us to meet in the Eugene B. Redmond Learning Center on the second floor of the library.

Ash won this round of the Howard vs. Howard photoshoot saga, and I will now spend the next several years returning to my tried-and-true strategy: avoiding his camera.

Related:  

Photoshoots in the Redmond Room (2015) and then the Redmond Center (2026)


March 2015


On March 18, 2015, I participated in a photoshoot in what was then known as the Redmond Reading Room, a space I created on the third floor of Lovejoy Library to host small exhibits and cultural events. On March 30, 2026, eleven years later, I took part in another photoshoot, this time in the Eugene B. Redmond Learning Center.

In 2015, university photographer Howard Ash informed me that he needed to take official photographs of me, something he had been doing with SIUE employees since he arrived in 2012. I was reluctant, but ultimately decided to participate.

[RelatedAnother Chapter in the Howard vs. Howard Photoshoot Saga]

I chose the Redmond Reading Room because I wanted to be near my books and some of the materials from the many exhibits I hosted. Posters featuring Frederick Douglass and Black Studies projects, as well as photographs of Maya Angelou, Eugene B. Redmond, Ralph Ellison, and others, were visible nearby.

In subsequent years, Ash repeatedly told me that I needed to update my headshots. I worked to evade him, but he finally persuaded me to agree this past Monday. I somehow had not realized that more than ten years had passed since that first photoshoot.





For the shoot on Monday, we met in the Redmond Center, located on the second floor of Lovejoy Library. Like that first photoshoot, I wanted to be surrounded by books and positioned in a Redmond-related space.

Ash and I were joined by university marketing associate Madelaine Deardeuff. We had a good time talking about photos, different poses, and comic books.

Tuesday, March 31, 2026

Why Cities, States Need Cultural Witnesses like Brian Gilmore


It’s fine and good that we have poet laureates, but we have to admit that cities and states should do themselves a favor and hire someone to produce the kind of cultural and literary history that Brian Gilmore provides in his book No More Worlds to Conquer: The Black Poet in Washington, DC (2026), chronicling poets and developments across generations.

I’m reading this book and wishing I had one for St. Louis, and wishing there was one for Chicago, Jackson, Mississippi, and Atlanta, and on and on. In my travels over the years, I’ve heard people discuss bits and pieces of their locals the way Gilmore discusses things in No More Worlds to Conquer. But he extends those fragments in a deep, interconnected, and thoughtful way, assembling a fuller account of a city’s poetic life.

I’ve always had what, in retrospect, was a vague sense that Washington, DC, was a critical locus of artistic production and literary activity in Black literary history. Gilmore fills in so many spaces, and he regularly offers ideas that never occurred to me. His book makes a strong case for local histories, but also for local chroniclers, or what I refer to as cultural witnesses. These figures document writers and texts, as well as readings, institutions, relationships, and evolving artistic communities.

Gilmore opens by mentioning a poetry reading that Paul Laurence Dunbar gave in DC in 1896. A year later, he moved to the city, where he worked at the Library of Congress. Dunbar is where Gilmore begins, and from there he takes us across the 20th century and into the 21st century, tracing overlapping circles of poets, venues, and organizations. 

More and more, over the decades in African American literary studies, it’s been common for scholars to produce more condensed studies, spans of five to ten years. That’s a positive result of a maturing discipline. On the other hand, it’s good to see such an expansive study like the one Gilmore provides. You get a macro view of poetry in DC, essentially tracing lineages and continuities from Dunbar’s reading in 1896 to a reading in the city in 2022. The long view makes visible patterns of mentorship, institutional support, and recurring sites of poetic gathering.

In an interview for his press, Gilmore noted that “I came along right at the time that one major era was winding up and another was beginning.” He was participating and taking note as the Black Arts era receded and spoken word, rap, and Go-Go took shape. He also noted that some of the city’s universities have important records and documents that made it possible for him to chart the long history of poetry and arts organizing in DC. Together, these materials and lived experiences allow him to document this wonderful, longstanding, evolving cultural ecosystem.

I hope aspiring poets in DC come across this book, and just as important, I hope arts organizers in cities and towns across the country get a hold of this book. Beyond serving as a wonderful history of this one city, Gilmore has produced a blueprint for illuminating local literary histories. 

Sunday, March 29, 2026

Marcellus Blount and the Case for Subfields in African American Literary Studies


One of my major discoveries over the last several months involved coming to a clearer understanding of the need to highlight subfields, not simply the field of African American literary studies. It turns out that some writings by the scholar Marcellus Blount were crucial to me getting there.

My key finding was that focusing exclusively on “the field” when referring to African American literary studies was not the best or most accurate move, since that term does not capture the range of topics and competing areas of inquiry that shape the discipline. Rather than concentrate on “the field” as a single entity, it became more productive to think in terms of subfields in African American literary studies in order to understand the varied and sometimes competing areas of study.

Early on, as I considered these ideas, I stumbled onto a 1984 bibliography, "Studies in Afro-American Literature" produced by Blount for Callaloo. Blount’s bibliography was followed by a series of additional bibliographies in Callaloo by other scholars. Blount’s bibliography includes introductory notes where he provides context for what he assembled.

Blount’s bibliography and the subsequent ones gave me a clearer view of developments based on section labels such as “Studies in Poetry,” “Studies in Fiction,” and “Studies in Individual Authors.” These categories indicated distinct areas of study. In the world of criticism that Blount and others highlighted, there were subfields, which offered a more precise way of understanding scholarly activity than the idea of a single unified field.

Without coming across that bibliographic work done by Blount, I would have had a harder time arriving at new realizations about specialization and differentiation in African American literary studies.

Related 

Additional:
Marcellus Blount clips (Columbia Center for Oral History Research)

Thursday, March 26, 2026

Black Women Detective Novelists Across Two Centuries


I wanted to see how many Black-authored detective and crime-related novels by women appear in the 20th century as opposed to the 21st century in the Literary Navigator Device.

For “Reading Form,” I selected novel, and for “Author Gender,” I selected “woman.” Using the genre filters, I selected “Crime/Detective/Mystery fiction” and then chose Early 20th century (1900–1939), Mid-20th century (1940–1965), and Late 20th century (1966–1999). I then repeated the search with only the 21st century selected.

I ended up with 8 results from the 20th century and 71 results from the 21st century. The contrast between the two periods is striking and immediately visible through the Navigator’s filtering system.

This discovery suggests that there are far more novels by Black women novelists in the 21st century. It also shows how the Navigator makes it possible to quickly identify shifts in genre participation across time.

Related:

Navigator Discoveries



This series of posts provides short research-based discoveries and use cases related to the Literary Navigator Device. Each entry highlights a specific search, explains the method used, and identifies a clear pattern, contrast, or finding drawn from the results.

Entries 

Subfields in African American Literary Studies

A brief take on subfields in African American literary studies, showing how areas like the Harlem Renaissance, Richard Wright studies, the Black Arts Movement, and Toni Morrison Studies emerged over time to organize research, debates, and scholarly communities.

Script by Howard Rambsy II
Narration by Kassandra Timm

------------ 
Related:

Alliteration as Cultural Strategy

A brief take on recurring alliteration in African American language practices, tracing how phrases like Sorrow Songs, Freedom Fighters, and New Negro Movement, use sound, rhythm, and repetition to enhance memorability, circulate ideas, and reinforce traditions of creativity, resistance, and representation.

Script by Howard Rambsy II 
Narration by Kassandra Timm



------------ 
Related: